![]() Neither device has a dedicated GPU option, so if you want to game on a Pro, spending the extra money is no doubt worth it.Īs expected, you're going to pay more for the newer Pro 7. ![]() Geekbench 5Īs for gaming, 10th Gen Core i5 and Core i7 Intel CPUs feature Iris Plus Graphics, which will provide a better experience than what the 8th Gen CPUs have to offer. ![]() That's the tradeoff for better performance. As for battery life, the Pro 7 will last about eight hours from a charge, whereas the Pro 6 hits closer to 10 hours. The Pro 7 Core i5 model outperforms the Pro 6 Core i7 model, which is quite impressive. Compared with Geekbench 5 tests, the Core i7-1065G7 begins around the 1,200 to 1,300 mark for a single-core score, while multi-core scores reach, in many cases, well above 4,000. The Pro 7 has been refreshed with 10th Gen Intel Core "Ice Lake" CPUs with a 10nm architecture, and it's available with Core i3, Core i5, and Core i7 versions. These CPUs can handle a relatively heavy workload, and they should be able to shred through any multitasking. The Core i7-8550U again measures around the 900 single-core score, reaching up to about a 3,500 multi-core score. Geekbench 5 single-core scores for the Core i5-8250U hover around the 800 to 900 mark, while multi-core scores reach up to about 3,400. These are not the later 8th Gen "Whiskey Lake" CPUs, but they're nevertheless performers. It is inexcusable for a program at version 12 to misdiagnose fonts as corrupt.The Surface Pro 6 is available with 8th Gen Intel Core i5 and i7 "Kaby Lake R" CPUs. ![]() To stay competitive, Suitcase Fusion needs to improve speed across the board. Suitcase Fusion 12.1.3: I had left Suitcase X for dead a couple versions ago since it was slow, plagued with stability issues and the slow-to-come updates rarely resolved any of the major issues that the program suffered from.Since it lacks any server option, it's strictly aimed at single users and with the current crop of bugs in FontExplorer 1.1, it's not for everyone who deals with font management. FontExplorer isn't stable or reliable enough with its auto-activation to unflinchingly recommend it for professional designers-yet. FontExplorer X 1.1 (free): The interface of FontExplorer X is really great and, for what I think is the first time, it gives fonts an environment where they shine like the little works of art that they are.If its interface were improved and its searching/filtering options were more powerful, I'd say it was an easy nine or ten but these are relatively minor criticisms for this font management workhorse. Still, it is a very good app and the best option for service bureaus. Still, the lack of accuracy for auto-activation of PostScript and OpenType fonts and the fact that it can't activate fonts off of removable media (forcing you to copy them) means it's not perfect. FontAgent Pro 3.3: It is very reliable, and it's the most stable font manager in my experience.His conclusions: Everweb 2 7 – drag and drop website builders. As for interface and font previewing, and searching and filtering, or extra features on the other hand, FontExplorer X wins hands down. For auto-activation of fonts in applications such as InDesign, or system-wide auto-activation, FontExplorer X was simply horrible. For dealing with corrupt or incomplete fonts, FontExplorer X wins (the others would not handle or repair corrupt font files). For big library organization, Suitcase Fusion is the only one that does it right ( FontExplorer X's centralized library is just all your fonts dropped into an alphabetical folder scheme of dubious value). He discusses Insider FontAgent Pro 3.3.0, Linotype FontExplorer 1.1, and Extensis Suitcase Fusion 12.1.3, and dismisses Apple's Font Book right away (doesn't let you deal with fonts outside of the system's established font folders preview only one font at a time slow for finding new fonts no auto-activation). Dave Girard publishes a comparative review of Mac OS X font managers in Ars Technica.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |